Coral ReefsImproving MPA Management

Our Ocean, Our People, Our Prosperity

Prof Heather Koldewey, Lead, Bertarelli Foundation’s Marine Science Programme

It’s a blustery sunny day as I walk along my beach at home in Cornwall. As I look out across the infinite blue water, I think of the opportunities for action at the Our Ocean conference taking place on the other side of the ocean in Palau. This extraordinarily beautiful archipelago of over 500 islands in the western Pacific has long been on my bucket list, not just for its incredible marine life but also because of the global leadership this small island developing state (SIDS) has taken in fully protecting 80% of its waters. Sadly, this time it was not to be for me as Covid struck meaning I was unable to travel. With quick reorganisation of some very complex logistics, the Marine Science programme was represented by Alexy Khrizman, our PhD student from Stanford University working on coral reefs in Palau and the Chagos Archipelago. Alexy sent news and images throughout the two days of the conference, shared on our @Marine_Science Twitter feed.

Image credit: Jack Fishman (PADI Aware)

I closely followed the conference online – how would Our Ocean deliver in the twice-delayed Ocean Super Year? Would momentum build from COP26 in Glasgow in recognising the ocean crisis is the climate crisis? How do these gatherings really make a difference for the planet, especially as we scrutinise the carbon footprint of every trip we make in the name of conservation? How can we make the most difference for the ocean in the shortest period of time?

The Our Ocean conferences have been defined by the hundreds of commitments of billions of dollars from governments, business, and civil society. A new report launched by the team from Oregon State University found that two-thirds of these commitments had been met, with real progress towards the rest. This encouraging analysis gives real optimism for the likely success of the impressive additional 410 commitments amounting to USD$16.35 billion made in Palau this week. However, the level of urgency and anxiety were clear. There are major problems to be solved. Illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing proliferates, the high seas treaty remains mired in political inertia, there are risks to MPAs due to economic crises, we are not meeting international targets for ocean sustainability, and there is an overall lack of urgent action even when we know the solutions. However, this week it seems the shipping sector stepped up to reduce their emissions, new technologies, tools, partnerships and collaborations were announced, and there was more engagement in the High Ambition Coalition of Nature and People.

The Our Ocean leaders were passionate and profound, but the voices of Palau that resonated most were those of indigenous communities and youth. These are voices we need to listen to, to hear and to act upon. The ocean currents from Palau will make waves to the UN Ocean Summit in Lisbon in June. From our perspective in the Marine Science programme, we continue to work to bring science into management and policy. The 121 scientific papers from our programme over the last four years demonstrate and reinforce the value of MPAs for biodiversity protection and ocean resilience. Our marine scientists are ocean leaders. We will be working hard from now till Lisbon, for the ocean, for people and for prosperity.

 

 

Sentinel Species Research

Restoring Seabird Islands

Restoring Seabird Islands

By Peter Carr, ZSL

Peter Carr

New research published this week in Restoration Ecology, led by scientists at ZSL’s Institute of Zoology, shows the potential benefits to breeding seabirds of converting coconut plantations to native habitats after invasive predators have been eradicated.

Red-footed Booby © Peter Carr, ZSL

Red-footed Booby © Peter Carr, ZSL

On many Pacific and Indian Ocean islands, colonisation by humans brought invasive species, the destruction of native habitats, and widespread growth of coconut plantations, leading to the decimation of seabird populations. The coconut industry on oceanic islands has since crashed, leaving the legacy of abandoned coconut plantations that, by themselves, create species-poor biomes. When an island’s flora is dominated by abandoned coconut plantations and it has invasive rats, it becomes an avian desert.

Experts from the Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, along with colleagues from the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, the University of Exeter, and Heriot-Watt University, have been researching the possible outcomes for breeding seabirds (e.g., Red-footed Booby and Lesser Noddy) of eradicating rats from oceanic islands, with and without conversion of surrounding abandoned coconut plantations.

Lesser Noddy © Peter Carr, ZSL

Lesser Noddy © Peter Carr, ZSL

Working for over a decade, collecting data in the Chagos Archipelago, central Indian Ocean, scientists counted every breeding seabird on all 55 islands of the archipelago, and mapped and recorded the habitat they were breeding in. By comparing the number of seabirds breeding in a specific habitat on rat-free islands, they were able to predict the number of seabirds that could potentially colonise an island if invasive rats were eradicated, and abandoned coconut plantations were converted to native habitats. This is especially relevant in the Chagos Archipelago, as some 94% of the terrestrial landmass is rat-infested, where the vegetation is dominated by abandoned plantations.

One island, Ile du Coin in Peros Banhos atoll which, at 1.26km squared, is the fourth largest in the Chagos Archipelago, was hypothetically ecologically restored. This island has rats, and 92% of its vegetation is made up of former coconut plantation. At present, there are 51 pairs of breeding seabirds on this island, made up of three generalist species (Brown and Lesser Noddy and Common White Tern). Scientists predict that, following rat eradication, without any habitat management, the number of breeding pairs could rise to 4,306 pairs of 14 species. However if 1 km squared of abandoned plantation is converted to equal measures of native savannah and forest (example shown below), the number of breeding pairs could potentially increase to 319,762 of 16 species – more than the entire archipelago at present.

Native seabird breeding habitat, Chagos Archipelago © Peter Carr, ZSL

Native seabird breeding habitat, Chagos Archipelago © Peter Carr, ZSL

This research has practical applications throughout the Tropics. It shows that in order to restore tropical oceanic seabird islands that have been ecologically degraded, due to introduced predators and the destruction of native habitat, eradicating the predator as a single intervention method is unlikely to result in fully functional, seabird-driven ecosystems. On degraded islands where invasive rats and abandoned coconut plantations exist together, to restore seabird-driven ecosystems, rats must be eradicated, but also the plantations must be converted to native habitat.

In the Chagos Archipelago, as elsewhere in the Tropics, restoring seabird islands is no longer a ‘green dream’, it is a matter of funding and political goodwill. This research shows the requirement for an ecosystem-wide approach in order to fulfil these green dreams, and demonstrates the potential colossal gains to the family of birds that are suffering the greatest decline in number – seabirds.

You can access the paper here, and find out more about our work in the Chagos Archipelago here.

Sentinel Species Research

Monitoring and identifying shark species in the Chagos Archipelago

Monitoring and identifying shark species in the Chagos Archipelago.

Recent work published by our researchers has shown that differences in movement strategies between two closely-related reef shark species can influence how vulnerable they are to poaching risk in the Chagos Archipelago and that by studying these movements, we can help to inform enforcement decisions in the MPA. Network analysis led by Dr David Jacoby, investigated the movement and space use of silvertip sharks (Carcharhinus albimarginatus) and grey reef sharks (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos) around Peros Banhos and Salomon atolls in the Chagos Archipelago and showed that despite living side-by-side, the two species move through the MPA in very different ways. The study used acoustic tracking to study how individuals from these two shark species moved within the MPA. This method involves catching sharks, surgically implanting acoustic tags and setting up an array of underwater receivers which record the tag ID as a tagged shark swims past. From this, the researchers were able to highlight key movement corridors that MPA enforcement patrols can focus on to help protect the sharks from illegal, unregulated and unreported (IUU) fishing activity. This study also showed that silvertip sharks were more wide-ranging and therefore more vulnerable to IUU activity than grey reef sharks.

Another way to monitor species in the MPA is to use DNA. Genetic analysis can be used to identify the diversity of species in the territory and even explore whether there are distinct populations within species. One recent monitoring technique that is gaining attention in ecosystems all over the world is species detection using environmental DNA, also known as eDNA. As animals pass through their environment, they leave traces of DNA behind them. In the MPA surrounding the Chagos Archipelago, we can collect eDNA from the water and use it to determine what species are present and this is a great way to detect shark species that we otherwise might not see.

To achieve genetic monitoring and detection through eDNA, researchers must first know the genetic sequence of the species they want to study. To this end, researchers Nick Dunn (from ZSL and Imperial College London) and Shaili Johri (from Stanford University) have sequenced and published the mitochondrial genome sequences of the grey reef shark, silvertip shark, whitetip reef shark (Triaenodon obesus) and silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis) from the Chagos Archipelago. Mitochondrial DNA is commonly used in genetic studies because it is easier to target than nuclear DNA and can be used to identify populations within species. To do this, small fin clips were taken from each of the species during tagging expeditions in the territory and their DNA was sequenced using two contrasting DNA sequencing techniques. Shaili used a handheld device called the Oxford Nanopore MinION to sequence whole mitochondrial genomes and Nick  produced his sequences using a more conventional approach on an Illumina sequencer that involves breaking DNA into small fragments and reproducing the complete sequence by using overlapping fragments, a bit like a puzzle. The mitochondrial genome sequences produced were the first ever published for the grey reef shark and the silvertip shark, and a first from populations in the Chagos Archipelago for the whitetip reef shark and the silky shark.

The sequences produced from the two techniques were over 99% similar, showing that both methods can be used in future research as the few differences were most likely to be due to differences between the individuals sequenced rather than errors. These mitochondrial genome sequences will be used to produce eDNA detection protocols for the species, which will help researchers understand how eDNA can be used to monitor shark species in the MPA. The sequences and methods used can also be used to investigate the connectivity of sharks in the Indian Ocean and to determine how significantly Chagos Archipelago reef sharks contribute to the shark fin trade.

References

Dunn, N., Johri, S., Curnick, D., Carbone, C., Elizabeth, A., Chapple, T. K., et al. (2020) Complete mitochondrial genome of the gray reef shark , Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos ( Carcharhiniformes : Carcharhinidae ). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 5, 2080–2082. doi:10.1080/23802359.2020.1765208.

Jacoby, D. M. P., Ferretti, F., Freeman, R., Carlisle, A. B., Chapple, T. K., Curnick, D. J., et al. (2020) Shark movement strategies influence poaching risk and can guide enforcement decisions in a large, remote Marine Protected Area. J. Appl. Ecol. doi:10.1111/1365‐2664.13654.

Johri, S., Chapple, T. K., Dinsdale, E. A., Schallert, R., and Block, B. A. (2020a) Mitochondrial genome of the silky shark Carcharhinus falciformis from the British Indian Ocean Territory Marine Protected Area . Mitochondrial DNA Part B. doi:10.1080/23802359.2020.1775147.

Johri, S., Chapple, T. K., Schallert, R., Dinsdale, E. A., and Block, B. A. (2020b) Complete mitochondrial genome of the whitetip reef shark Triaenodon obesus from the British Indian Ocean Territory Marine Protected Area . Mitochondrial DNA Part B. doi:10.1080/23802359.2020.1775148.

Johri, S., Dunn, N., Chapple, T. K., Curnick, D., Savolainen, V., Dinsdale, E. A., et al. (2020c) Mitochondrial genome of the Silvertip shark, Carcharhinus albimarginatus, from the British Indian Ocean Territory. Mitochondrial DNA Part B Resour. doi:10.1080/23802359.2020.1765210.

News piece by Nick Dunn

Sentinel Species Research

Use of Environmental DNA to Investigate Biodiversity

Use of Environmental DNA to investigate biodiversity

Environmental DNA, or eDNA, is genetic material that is left behind in the environment as organisms pass through it. The material can originate from skin cells, scales, mucus, faeces or wounds, and because organisms have unique genetic sequences, it can be used to provide us with information on the presence of target species.

Sampling for eDNA in the field is a relatively straightforward process and begins with the collection of water samples. During an expedition to Diego Garcia in British Indian Ocean Territory in September 2019, Nick Dunn (PhD student at ZSL and Imperial College London) took eDNA samples from different locations around the atoll. At each of the 18 locations, he sampled water from two depths using a five litre Niskin bottle, which is essentially a chamber with two spring-loaded stoppers at each end. Attached to a rope, the bottle was sent down to a depth of 40m and a messenger weight sent down to trigger the spring to close the chamber and allow the team to bring the water sample back up to the boat. The 40m water was decanted into a storage container and a surface water sample was then collected. The water samples were stored on ice in a cool box and taken back to land for processing.

A Niskin bottle containing a sample of water from a depth of 40m.

Processing eDNA involves passing the water through an extremely fine filter to separate all the cells and DNA in the sample. As DNA can degrade quickly in water, Nick ensured that this was done as soon as the team returned to land each morning and evening. Three 1-litre subsamples from each container were passed through separate filters, a process which took between ten and 20 minutes because the filters were so fine. The filters were then placed in a preservation solution so they could be transported back to the UK for analysis without the DNA degrading.

Equipment used to filter the water samples.

Working on eDNA is beneficial because you do not need to rely on chance encounters with animals to collect data and investigate the biodiversity of an area. The next steps, which are currently underway, involve finding out what species’ DNA has been collected in each sample using genetic sequencing methods. This will give us a clearer picture of what species are present around the island of Diego Garcia and if different areas are home to diverse sets of species.